<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for markshaw.biz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markshaw.biz/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markshaw.biz</link>
	<description>Champion of small businesses harnessing Twitter to Crush the big boys</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter training MP3 &#8211; Download it for just a tweet&#8230; by PedroStephano</title>
		<link>http://www.markshaw.biz/twitter-training-mp3-download-it-for-just-a-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-3319</link>
		<dc:creator>PedroStephano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshaw.biz/?p=3779#comment-3319</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m importing that into my iTunes so I can listen again and again. Thanks!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m importing that into my iTunes so I can listen again and again. Thanks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should you use BufferApp and Tweet Old Post? by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.markshaw.biz/should-you-use-bufferapp-and-tweet-old-post/comment-page-1/#comment-3317</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshaw.biz/?p=3798#comment-3317</guid>
		<description>I think you have a great point Mark. Updates should be super relevant and not just blasted out from your archives.


That said - perhaps there is use in methodically revisiting old posts to boost traffic long term? Agreed though, apps that just pick through posts which are no longer correct or out of date are very annoying (and potentially misleading).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have a great point Mark. Updates should be super relevant and not just blasted out from your archives.</p>
<p>That said &#8211; perhaps there is use in methodically revisiting old posts to boost traffic long term? Agreed though, apps that just pick through posts which are no longer correct or out of date are very annoying (and potentially misleading).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should you use BufferApp and Tweet Old Post? by Sandra NichollsMarcy</title>
		<link>http://www.markshaw.biz/should-you-use-bufferapp-and-tweet-old-post/comment-page-1/#comment-3316</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra NichollsMarcy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshaw.biz/?p=3798#comment-3316</guid>
		<description>Urgh, formatting looks weird! Hey ho ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Urgh, formatting looks weird! Hey ho &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

